Anneke van Baalen, HIDDEN MASCULINITY, Max Weber's historical sociology of bureaucracy,  
Amsterdam 1994, dissertation University of Amsterdam INTRODUCTION 
 
 
 
4
present themselves: one can try either to translate the factors that define the position of 
women versus the 'organization' or 'bureaucracy' into the factors that define the position of 
sex-neutral 'individuals' according to universalist sociology, or one can try to translate the 
sex-neutral concepts of universalist sociology in sex-defined terms.  
 
If the first option is chosen, universalist sociology is enriched with some more 'laws', 
formulated in sex-neutral concepts. The most famous of these is the 'law of numbers' which 
was formulated in 1977 by Rosabeth Moss Kanter. It says that as soon as people who work 
in an organization or department, where they form a minority of a 'significant social type'
14 
which is deviant from the 'significant social type' of the majority, they become either totally 
invisible or too visible  to the majority.
15
 In the latter case they become 'tokens'.  
The concept 'token' was formulated by the black and feminist movements: the token black, 
the token woman, is the exception who proves the rule - the exclusion of blacks or women
16 
- by displaying all the stereotyped characteristics members of the majority expect; the 
majority then reacts by in its turn exaggerating its own stereotyped characteristics.  
Kanter takes all her illustrations of her concept of 'numbers' from her own experience as an 
organization adviser and from reports of other women in organizations, which she found in 
feminist texts. As soon as a token woman appears on the scene, the men around her 
become more masculinist, especially in social contacts outside the formal work situation: 
young men brag about their sexual victories, older men of their business ones.
17
  The token 
woman is visible only as a woman, not as a colleague; if she tries to show her achievements, 
the men, fearing she performs better, often retaliate. She is also pressurized to turn against 
other women, since she has to share the men's notions about her own sex: to believe that 
women just are not able to perform the tasks she herself performs.
18 
The token woman is therefore compelled to conform to female stereotypes - she can only 
choose which one.
19
 Kanter's analysis here echoes the feminist theory that in patriarchal 
culture men divide women in 'mothers' and 'whores'; to the types of 'mother' and 'seducer', 
though, she adds those of the 'iron lady' - unmarried aunt - and 'mascot' - 'kid sister'. Of all 
these only the iron lady expects equal treatment from men; since men do not know how to 
deal with her claim, she finds herself isolated. One could summarize Kanter's description in 
the statement that the token woman can be seen both as the symbol of equality between 
women and men and as a living proof of their inequality. 
Kanter's approach of 'numbers' is easy to criticize: any investigation of the situation of men 
who form a minority among women will show that their 'visibility' results in quite different 
                                                 
14
 Kanter p. 208; or 'persons bearing a different set of social characteristics', p. 210. 
15
 Kanter p. 210: 'The proportional rarity of tokens is associated with three perceptual tendencies: visibility, 
contrast, and assimilation. These are all derived simply from the ways any set of objects are perceived.'  
16
 See Oxford Concise Dictionary on 'token': beside the meaning of 'sign, symbol, evidence (of affection etc' 
another meaning is given: that of 'a. Serving as token(s) or sample; perfunctory; ~money (...); ~payment, 1. 
payment of small proportion of sum due as indication that debt is not repudiated, 2. nominal payment; 
~resistance, ~strike (brief, to demonstrate strength of feeling only); ~vote, Parliamentary vote of money in which 
the amount stated pro forma to allow discussion is not meant to be binding; ~Ism, policy of making only a token 
effort of doing no more than is minimally necessary.'  
17
 Kanter p. 221 ff.; see also Rogers (1988) p. 22 ff.  
18
 Kanter (1977) p. 228 ff.  
19
 Kanter p. 233 ff.